Question :
A question was about [the validity of] intercession (al-tawassul).
Fatwa in Brief: Al-tawassul with a human
[even the Prophet] after his/her death is illegal; it is
a [reprehensible] innovation.
Shaykh Ibn al-‘Uthaymin, Fatawa al-‘Aqida 267-270
Shaykh Ahmad Farid,
www.alsalafway.com
Response:
The majority of religious scholars permit intercession (tawassul)
through the Prophet (upon him be peace). Here, the
Muslim may say: “I ask you through your Prophet and
through the rights of Your Prophet [for such and such a
thing]”. This form of tawassul has always been
permitted, both when the Prophet (upon him be peace) was
alive and after his death.
Commentary:
God Almighty ordered his believers to intercede with Him
in a variety of ways, such as through the performance of
good deeds:
“O ye who believe! Be mindful of your duty to Allah,
and seek the way to approach unto Him”. (Q. 5: 35)
Another way of performing tawassul is by
[contemplating] the Names and Attributes of God
Almighty.
“Allah’s are the fairest names. Invoke Him by them”. (Q. 7: 180.)
The performance of tawassul make be directed
through the Prophet (upon him be peace). There are no
disagreements regarding the legality of al-tawassul
for affairs of this world or the hereafter when the
Prophet (upon him be peace) lived. Indeed, at that time,
the Prophet was expected to intercede on behalf of
Muslims in life and to save them from torment in the
Afterlife. On the other
hand, the scholars hold different opinions regarding the
validity of seeking intercession through the
Prophet (upon him be peace), now that he no longer
lives.
The majority of scholars (Malikis, Shafi‘is, late
Hanafis and Hanbalis) permit Muslims to seek the
intercession of the Prophet (upon him be peace), both
during his lifetime and after his death. According to a
report included by al-Qustalani and narrated by Imam
Malik, Malik was asked by Abu Ja‘far al-Mansour al-‘Abbasi,
the second Caliph of Bani ‘Abbas, “O father of ‘Abd
Allah, Should I face the Messenger of God (upon him be
peace) when making du‘a? Or should I instead face
the qibla? To this, Malik replied: “why would you
turn your face away from him when, on the last day, he
is the key to God’s forgiveness for both you and your
father Adam (upon him be peace)? No,
face him and ask for his intercession, so that God will
grant it to you”. In his book Fada’il Malik, Abu
al-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Fahr includes the same report, with a
sound chain of transmission; and, in Al-Shifa’,
al-Qadi ‘Iyad also includes this hadith, on the
advice of a number of reliable Shaykhs.
Some of the later Hanbali scholars rule
that the seeking of intercession through the Prophet
(upon him be peace) himself is illegal. Yet [the Hanbali
scholar], Ibn Taymiyya argues that intercession is
permitted when the formula “I ask You through Your
Prophet Muhammad (upon him be peace)” is used; and, that
when using this formula, the person seeking intercession
is asking God solely through his belief in [the message
of] and love for the Prophet (upon him be peace). For
those who follow this approach [that of Ibn Taymiyya],
tawassul is a blessed practice; and there is no
legal disagreement over this matter. Yet, many of public
say this expression, but mean something else [i.e. they
speak directly to the Prophet and not to God]. These are
the people who were criticized and refuted [by the
classical scholars].
Regarding the seeking of intercession
through righteous figures other than the Prophet (upon
him be peace), our approach is no different than in the
preceding argument. After noting that this practice is a
source of considerable disagreement (khilafiyya),
Ibn Taymiyya points out that accusing someone of
unbelief merely on the grounds that s/he practices
tawassul through the Prophet [as was happening at
the time] is both illegal (haram) and a sin (ithm).
A person who accuses someone of unbelief for this reason
is acting excessively and, like anyone who acts
excessively in the sphere of religion, deserves a strong
punishment. Ibn Taymiyya’s view is supported by the
following hadith: “if
any Muslim accuses his
brother of unbelief then one of them [either he or his
brother] is truly guilty of this [unbelief].[1]
Dr. Yassir ‘Abd al-‘Azim
[1]
Al-Mawsu‘a al-Fiqiyya 14/161.